Posts by Bushranger

    marcel,



    I I copied as proposed the


    JUKEBOXDevices = 1
    JUKEBOXDevice0 = C:\dicomserver\Jukebox0\dv0_%04d\


    CACHEDevices = 1
    CACHEDevice0 = C:\dicomserver\Cache%d\dv0_%04d\


    into the dicom.ini and run the batchfile


    mkdir c:\dicomserver\jukebox0
    mkdir c:\dicomserver\cache0


    dgate --selectlruforarchival:4300000,MAG0
    dgate --preparebunchforburning:JUKEBOX0.1,MAG0
    xcopy /s/e c:\dicomserver\cache0\dv0_0001\*.* c:\dicomserver\jukebox0\dv0_0001
    dgate --deletebunchafterburning:JUKEBOX0.1


    but to my surprise only 1 dvd had been created and this contained 5,6 GB.
    ( the first patients of the alphabet )
    Is the batch-file able to create multiple dvd for storing and burning?
    Anything wrong with the posted files?

    P.S
    I don t get an error message, I don t have access to the images.
    I guess my configuration if the config file is not correct, cause there is a difference in the names between the ODBC Driver for MySQL and MSSQL.
    And with this I ve probs.

    manzing


    I ve some trouble to get WEBGATE running with MSSQL2000.
    What did you put it for


    uid - user name ( your log in name to windows?
    driver - ODBC-driver. Given name in ODBC?
    server - hostname of database-server (local)- localhost or the servername?


    I tried a lot but I couldn t get access to the images. I only got it running with mysql.


    Gan you give me some help?

    I programmed the files and added a new file ( and made a German Translation as well ) to be able to search by studydate, which to my mind makes it easier than to search by ID, which is mostly unknown to the users.
    I am thinking if it makes sense to search additionally by birthdate or referring physician.

    I import the studies from the security copy via filesystem, that works.
    Displaying the studies and burning to cd as well.
    But transfer to conquest or efilm is not possible. Drag and drop direct to conquest fails as well.
    We really dont know what to do. BTW, the developer of the pacs has made bancrupt, so hhelp from this side is not available.

    To my mind, DBASE is a little bit outdated as a database.
    I would avvice for professional use MSSQL2000 ( or MsSQL2005 ), or MySQl which is in continous development supported by a lot of forums in case of probs.

    manzing
    partial name is working, I checked that. Wildcards not. I added the function to seek also by studydate which is also working.
    But with lossless compression it doesn t seem to work.
    And the the viewer doesn t display the overlay, so the image doesnt display the patients name ( at least in my case ), which is a big disadvantage.
    If all that probs could be corrected, it seems very promising.

    @Scots
    Well, Yo ve asked what evrybody is using.
    I friend of mine is using w2003 with Mysql with roundabout 1TB without any greater probs.
    Our cooperating hospital usues linux with postgres as a database without any probs.
    I ve poticed that more hospitals are tending to use linux cause its a lot cheaper and as well stable.
    Our system has 1,5 TB capacity, 800 GB used at the moment.

    Hello,


    for testing I made an installation on my notebook to check some functions.
    Without network connection, I am not able to query/move the patients in the database.
    Apart from that I cant make a dicomconnection from the installed efilm.
    Any suggestions how to solve that prob?
    Connection the notebook to the net, there arern t any problems.

    for editing the patient information, I would read out the images from conquest with k-pacs for example and after editing sending them back to conquest after deleting the old study. Thats the way we are working, when some informations have to be corrected.

    I ve set up a system ( P4 3GHz and 2 GB ram ) with win xp pro and MsSQL2000 as a database and it s running fast and stable.
    I wouldn t absolutely advice the use of vista, cause of lack of experiences and apart from that it consumes more hardware resources than Xp. You even can give Xp most of the new functions of vista, what I ve read in forums.
    In total, for working at home, I prefer w2k, running absolutely stable and fast.